Shouldn't the government get control over the budget and corruption before it controls health care?

you'd think so, wouldn't you?





but perhaps we're looking at it from the wrong end: government is SUCCESSFULLY KILLING AMERICA SECTOR BY SECTORShouldn't the government get control over the budget and corruption before it controls health care?
None of those will ever happen. Congress busts the budget, no matter the amount. As long as there is money to get, there will be corruption. The government will never be able to control health care.


Quinn's first rule: liberalism always generates a result that is the opposite of it's intent.Shouldn't the government get control over the budget and corruption before it controls health care?
No. Health care is an important factor in the economy...it needs to be dealt with concurrently.





You will never ';control'; corruption as long as you have human beings running things.





BTW, where was all this concern during the past 8 years? Billion dollar NO BID contracts? No corruption there, I bet.
No, people are dying and going bankrupt because they don't have health care, we need single payer right now like yesterday.
I would be happy if the 'government' got control of SOMETHING.





ANYTHING. Just one thing. You know, HOPE!
One would think so, but honestly,, I don't think it was covered in Community Organizer class.
I agree...finally some logical sense.
yes... but dems only know how to spend, and they do regardless of the costs